The performance of the contract is carried out when the main obligations of a contract end. The termination of this contract means the termination of a contractual relationship. However, the parties may terminate a contract, even if they do not meet the primary obligations required by a contract. The main difference between dismissal and termination of a contract is therefore the condition in which a contractual relationship ends. A very thin line distinguishes these two actions. Another type of anticipated violation is any voluntary act of a party that destroys or seriously impairs that party`s ability to honour the promise made to the other party. If a landowner who has agreed to sell a quantity to a person at some point sells it to a third party before that date, there is an anticipatory offence. If Carpenter announces in May that instead of building the owner`s bridge in July as agreed, he is going on a trip to Europe, there will be an expected break. At trial, it would be pointless to show the law firm whether the date comes to await the act, so that the law gives a right of action if the country is sold to the other person. In the second instance, it would be pointless to wait until July if Carpenter does not actually do the work, so the law gives the right to take legal action if future non-compliance is announced. The subject may unilaterally discharge the debtor`s obligation by cancelling, destroying or handing over the written document containing the contract or other mandatory evidence. No consideration is required; Indeed, the obligated person makes a donation of the right he possesses. A particular method of annulment, destruction or surrender is not necessary as long as the obligated is declared intended to have the effect of his action being to discharge the obligation.

The whole document can be given to the debtor and say, “Here you owe me nothing.” The obligated can cut the paper into pieces and tell the debtor that he did it because he wants nothing more. Or it can mutilate signatures or thwart writing. This notion of non-feasibility of common law has been taken up by the UCC. Unique Code of Trade, Section 2-615. If performance can only be achieved with extreme difficulty or with extremely unreasonable costs, this can be excused on the theory of commercial infeasibility. However, “unworkable” (action is impossible) is not the same as “non-practical” (the action would provide insufficient performance or have little practical value).

SHARE IT:

Related Posts